Build a plan from this source.
[Re] Badder Seeds: Reproducing the Evaluation of Lexical Methods for Bias Measurement is included below. Adapt the question and comparison, then copy or download your plan.
Make the question your own.
1 source · Exact preparation context
- [Re] Badder Seeds: Reproducing the Evaluation of Lexical Methods for Bias Measurement →
van der Togt, Jille; Tiyavorabun, Lea; Rosati, Matteo; Starace, Giulio. [Re] Badder Seeds: Reproducing the Evaluation of Lexical Methods for Bias Measurement. ReScience C 8(2), #40; 10.5281/zenodo.6574705.
Record revision: 8c14260103243f8e9711663fdd81fe4846ce97a214a341da97e8bc939a7dfad4
Source links open the current listing. This plan retains the revisions above; listing review does not grant permission to copy or adapt source files.
Before carrying out this plan
- PyTorch (named in journal metadata; dependency version not checked)
Limits to keep in view
- No research code was executed; no independent scientific verification has been performed.
- The current qualified pilot is self-contained Python 3.13 with a 90-second author deadline. This article's environment has not been qualified for that path.
- Published source metadata and a historical review do not establish compatibility, successful reproduction, operator independence or current scientific correctness.
- Dependencies named in metadata are not available under the current standard-library-only pilot; a new qualified environment is required.
Edit freely. Export a copy before reloading or leaving. Your text stays in this tab until you choose to copy, download or save it privately.
Need a starting point with sources? Explore the research briefs →