[Re] Modeling Insect Phenology Using Ordinal Regression and Continuation Ratio Models
An R replication of insect phenology modeling with ordinal regression and continuation-ratio models.
External publication. Published by its original venue; not published in our journal.
How do ordinal probability estimates and calibration change across held-out time periods in a rights-cleared dataset?
An evaluator controls time-based splits and ordinal scoring; model probabilities are checked for nonnegativity and normalization.
What you could produce
- Versioned protocol, input and environment manifest, and independent per-case comparison table including uncertainty and incomplete cases.
Before you use it
- Exact article-specific dependencies, data and build requirements remain uninspected.
Limits to keep in view
- No research code was executed; no independent scientific verification has been performed.
- The current qualified pilot is self-contained Python 3.13 with a 90-second author deadline. This article's environment has not been qualified for that path.
- Published source metadata and a historical review do not establish compatibility, successful reproduction, operator independence or current scientific correctness.
- The language/runtime named by the upstream source is outside the current qualified Python-only pilot.
Source and permission context
Boersch-Supan, Philipp H.. [Re] Modeling Insect Phenology Using Ordinal Regression and Continuation Ratio Models. ReScience C 7(1), #5; 10.5281/zenodo.5006005.
Rights need review. Review the scope and upstream conditions before reuse.
manuscript · CC-BY-4.0
The exact Zenodo record cited by the journal declares cc-by-4.0; the journal separately identifies published manuscripts as CC BY. This records manuscript rights, not separate code/data licenses or archive contents.
Inspect the license evidence ↗Still unresolved
- The associated code's exact license and version-specific third-party notices have not been independently checked.
- Data licenses, permissions, consent restrictions and redistribution conditions have not been independently checked.
- Artifacts are referenced only; PDF/archive contents, dependency locks and bytes have not been inspected or executed.