An open library for your next question. Public pilot
Executable Science
Log inCreate account
← All research briefs
RESEARCH BRIEF · 6 SOURCES

Make an agent benchmark attempt auditable

Can another operator reconstruct one bounded agent-evaluation attempt from its task, environment, actions, failures and scoring rule?

Make this plan your own ↓

Read, edit and export without an account. This is preparation; no run or result is claimed.

YOUR WORKING PLAN

Make the question your own.

Working copy · In this tab
6 sources · Exact preparation context
  • SWE-bench →

    Preserve the upstream project name, repository, exact source commit and applicable contributor/notices; resolve upstream citation guidance for any later formal use.

    Record revision: 1f31e75c09dbdc82d77006e8f81c4de720d9d47f1ea05f98d079adb3cbd5705c

  • mini-SWE-agent →

    Preserve the upstream project name, repository, exact source commit and applicable contributor/notices; resolve upstream citation guidance for any later formal use.

    Record revision: d85f6be8b78c3e3e418f8db3071d410b0d164e590bc1d3d29d8db6f4c381766d

  • AgentBench →

    Preserve the upstream project name, repository, exact source commit and applicable contributor/notices; resolve upstream citation guidance for any later formal use.

    Record revision: 2cb203b47e5f3887f6a369d5f3b01ba55b4b6e6a8c401787b5702b5f3d3d3680

  • SciCode →

    Preserve the upstream project name, repository, exact source commit and applicable contributor/notices; resolve upstream citation guidance for any later formal use.

    Record revision: 2cd64e8968ece525554267c471f8d32d72f5eb9c05f6a30baca0de45fb3aae47

  • EvalPlus →

    Preserve the upstream project name, repository, exact source commit and applicable contributor/notices; resolve upstream citation guidance for any later formal use.

    Record revision: b013666ce40ca755b776a6148550f33b59f063a952519bb1ee731363d4d8214d

  • HumanEval →

    Preserve the upstream project name, repository, exact source commit and applicable contributor/notices; resolve upstream citation guidance for any later formal use.

    Record revision: 476aa19deba6efb2ef9b44698d560702b471d74b2327f7eb155c3ab6ca3c6147

Source links open the current listing. This plan retains the revisions above; listing review does not grant permission to copy or adapt source files.

Before carrying out this plan

  • Benchmark payloads, issue text, reference code and model rights need their own checks.
  • Agent-generated code and benchmark environments require a qualified isolated execution path; ordinary host execution or a local container is insufficient.
  • Resolve SciCode's recorded route/dependency caveat and any moving data default before pinning an input.

Limits to keep in view

  • None of these benchmarks or agents was executed by this collection.
  • No success rate, independent replication, safe sandbox qualification or superiority claim is made.

Edit freely. Export a copy before reloading or leaving. Your text stays in this tab until you choose to copy, download or save it privately.

What to compare

Reconstruct a single attempt before comparing aggregate rates. Keep retries and unsuccessful attempts in the denominator specified by the protocol. Author actions and generated tests cannot manufacture a platform-controlled verdict.

Useful outputs

  • One selected task and immutable data/code/environment identifiers with scoped rights records.
  • An explicit allowed-tools/network policy, model/prompt configuration, attempt budget and immutable scoring rule.
  • An attempt log preserving timeout, infrastructure failure, invalid output and scientific/task outcome separately.

Inputs and prerequisites

  • Benchmark payloads, issue text, reference code and model rights need their own checks.
  • Agent-generated code and benchmark environments require a qualified isolated execution path; ordinary host execution or a local container is insufficient.
  • Resolve SciCode's recorded route/dependency caveat and any moving data default before pinning an input.

What this work would not establish

  • None of these benchmarks or agents was executed by this collection.
  • No success rate, independent replication, safe sandbox qualification or superiority claim is made.

Start with these sources.

Software

SWE-bench

Upstream project repository

Software issue-resolution benchmark and evaluation tooling for studying patch assessment and reproducibility.

Investigate Can one explicitly licensed fixture demonstrate that patch application and test-result collection preserve the original issue/task identity?

Listing reviewed · source terms apply
Software

mini-SWE-agent

Upstream project repository

Compact software engineering agent implementation for examining minimal agent loops and inspectable action traces.

Investigate Can a tiny offline task distinguish task success from a successful shell command in a recorded agent trajectory?

Listing reviewed · source terms apply
Software

AgentBench

Upstream project repository

Multi-environment agent benchmark repository for investigating task adapters and evaluation consistency.

Investigate Can a single reviewed environment separate malformed agent actions, infrastructure errors and genuine task failures?

Listing reviewed · source terms apply
Software

SciCode

Upstream project repository

Scientific coding benchmark repository linking problem formulations and evaluation logic for researcher-oriented model assessment.

Investigate Can one rights-reviewed scientific coding task distinguish a syntactically valid solution from numerical correctness under fixed tolerances?

Listing reviewed · source terms apply
Software

EvalPlus

Upstream project repository

Code-generation evaluation tooling and expanded testing resources for studying test coverage and result reproducibility.

Investigate Can a hand-authored incorrect solution pass a weak fixture but fail a separately specified edge-case test?

Listing reviewed · source terms apply
Software

HumanEval

Upstream project repository

Code-generation evaluation repository for examining functional correctness and pass-at-k estimation on programming tasks.

Investigate Does the pass-at-k aggregation match an independently enumerated finite set of synthetic candidate outcomes?

Listing reviewed · source terms apply